Archives

All posts for the month March, 2011

Today's blog post, "Writers and Impostor Syndrome" is over at the blog of a Twitter friend of mine, Asheyna.

There’s a term used in academia that references a particular kind of depression common in graduate students: Impostor Syndrome.

Impostor Syndrome refers to a feeling that many high-achieving academics or students have that they don’t deserve their accomplishments; that they’re not really smart or up to par with their peers, and that one day something will happen to “unmask” them. They live in fear of the moment when everyone will discover they don’t actually belong with the other students.

Impostor Syndrome hits a lot of writers hard, because we’re always been told by other people how our individual writing experience should be. Because there’s no benchmark for writers — Word count? Consistency? Publication? Quality? — it becomes extremely difficult for us to measure our validity.

(Rest can be found here.)

Take your average speculative fiction book and look at the blurb: chances are, you'll see a lot of hyperbole going on in there. "The strongest". "The most powerful". "The youngest". "The brightest". Occasionally it will be phrased as a question — "Could Character A, a lowly etc, be the most hyperbolic etc in history?"  If it's YA fantasy, take your average probability and double it.

I can see the appeal. When stuck in mediocrity like so many of us are (myself included), it can be fun to read about people who are extraordinary, who go above and beyond. Many of them are Cinderella stories of talent — orphans who turn out to be the Most Powerful Young Wizard of the Age, that sort of thing — while others are about brilliant, disgruntled characters who know their worth, but have to prove it to others (usually older, less talented, and supremely jealous). People have lapped this up for years.

I'm going to be unpopular now, because I actually hate it.

I love books about ordinary people who end up doing extraordinary things, in spite of themselves and everything around them. The Lord of the Rings wasn't amazing because the characters turned out to be The Most Powerful Hobbits and Men of All Time. It's about perseverance, and loss, and being forced to carry out a task you never really wanted and honestly don't believe you're up to doing. It's about one foot in front of the other. The character struggles throughout the series are phenomenal. Samwise Gamgee is my favourite for a reason; he got into this just checking the gardens, and came back a hero, not because he secretly had a Well of Power within him, but because he was loyal and stubborn.

I'm a little curious why so many books feel the need to make their protagonists The Best. For one thing, it seems a little lazy — if we're told ahead of time that the character is (or could be) The Most Whatever, it seems like a shortcut to the end. For another, it makes the character's personal growth a little hollow, at least to me. Oh dear, Character X has to "deal" with the fact that he's not just a lowly orphan, but in fact has more power than anyone has ever seen. Um. Wah? Very little is compelling about these characters to me, and authors have to work even harder to make me like their characters. I absolutely adore "Ender's Game" and "Ender's Shadow", but even then I kept rolling my eyes at Poor Ender/Bean, the Misunderstood Genius.

Writing aside, I think it's actually a dangerous idea to propagate in YA fiction. Kids have a hard enough time as is — so why do we keep teaching them that the only real heroes are the ones who turn out to be the smartest, the strongest, the most powerful? In the end, it doesn't matter how much other characters may work (Vegeta and Hermione come to mind) — the protagonist's intrinsic power (whether he or she realizes and accepts it at first or not) is what trumps all.  Ash Ketchum kept winning Pokemon battles for no reason other than the fact that he's Ash Ketchum — even though Gary trained more, worked harder.

For kids who know that they're the Hufflepuffs, not the Gryffindors, it can be frustrating. Why even bother?

It certainly was to me when I was younger. Faced with book after book of brilliant, genius, superbly talented children whose biggest problem was getting adults to listen to them, or low-spirited waifs who discovered their Power Within, I quickly grew discouraged and disgusted and turned to books with protagonists who weren't the best, but struggled through to win anyway.

I'm perfectly aware I'm in the minority here, so fire away!

***EDIT***

This is a real-life example of exactly the sort of heroes I like to read about, but don't often see.

I know I've said this before, but I love plum blossoms even more than cherry blossoms. Sakura are popular not just for their beauty but for their transience — three or four days maximum — so they become a sort of poetic metaphor. Well, I like my flowers to last a little longer, thanks, and I prefer bright to pale, so plum blossoms have my vote.

Let’s lighten things up, shall we?

This week I attended the 豊年祭り in Nagoya. This is a very popular event with foreigners (about 30% of the crowd each year, which is huge), probably due to its alternate name: the Penis Festival. Yep.

The Hounen Matsuri celebrates springtime, the harvest, and fertility — both nature and, well, human. It’s a lighthearted festival, a good way for people to unwind after a long winter — or, in this case, a series of natural disasters.

I’ll start with the food:

Those are bananas, with marshmallow, ahem, accoutrements. The sprinkles provide the final touch, I think. These stalls were everywhere, and let me tell you, they were POPULAR. People of all ages were eating them whilst giggling hysterically and taking photos. One group of young guys and their girlfriends, maybe in their early twenties, were having a riot.

I don’t like bananas, alas, so I couldn’t partake. There were also sausages and various candies. I’ll update later with those, as I didn’t have time to take photographs in the street.

Next, the souvenirs:

This was hand-carved, given to me for free by the guy who made them. I asked if he wanted money or donations, but he said no.

These are common at every shrine; you write your wishes and hang them. Usually, though there are pictures of zodiac animals or happy people or cranes. NOT TODAY.

Any shrine worth its salt has its own special omamori, or protective charms. The ones here are a little more unique than most.

Next, the shrine:

Tagata Jinja is where the giant phallus comes to rest at the end of the festival. As such, its gardens have a certain je ne sais quoi.

These rocks are usually people or monkeys or dragons.

189550_988642291341_58016961_55141173_2883242_n

I don’t think I need to describe this one.

These strips of cloth are for good luck; the shrine has many, many of these branches, all of which will be stripped bare by crazed luck-seekers in the final moments of the festival. I got mine without bloodshed, thank you.

Next, the meat and potatoes, if you will:

When praying, you customarily bow to the centre of the shrine. Sometimes there are figures or totems, like foxes for Inari. These are a little weirder.

Taken under duress, this one. I was happy just to have photos of the main event on its own, but a very enthusiastic Japanese man insisted I stand next to it. Then he and a bunch of other Japanese men started shouting “Touch! Touch! Touch!”  My Japanese friend jokingly called it ‘positive sexual harassment’. The best part, though, had to be all the Japanese tourists whipping out their cameras to take photos of the foreigner and the giant phallus.

The point, though, is that touching it will bring you good luck.

My father says this makes him think of Dune: The Porno, and now I cannot unsee it. The spice must flow, indeed.

In any other country, holding up your infant to kiss a giant phallus would probably get you a call from social services. Here, everybody cheered.

Next, the procession!

A quick note: it’s between 500-1000m between the two shrines, and it takes nearly 2 hours to get from one to the other. This is because the procession only moves about 15 feet at a time, if that — partly so as many people can touch the phallus as possible, but also because it is darned heavy, and the 10 or so guys carrying the mikoshi can only hold it for half a minute at best.

The procession begins! The guy with the megaphone calls out to the men carrying (one, two, three, LIFT! one, two, three, MOVE!), and also to the crowd (back! back! stay back! move aside please!). When he told everyone to widen the gap because it wouldn’t fit, I nearly lost it. I am mature, yes.

Do these ladies have the best or worst job? You decide.

I’d make some sort of joke about this, but I’m afraid I’ll get shut down. Let’s move on, shall we?

There is no title text associated with these images for a darn good reason…

Bringing everything to the shrine for the finale. In about 30 seconds, there will be nothing left on those branches.

The phallus mikoshi, making its way to the final stretch of the journey.

At this point, the polite Japanese descend into a band of absolute madmen as they rush to get shots of the mikoshi entering the shrine.

Yes, this does mean what you’re thinking.

And finally … the mochi-throwing.

At the end of the festival, men up on balconies toss rocks, I mean rice cakes, down to the crowd below. This picture was taken before the throwing started, so it does not come anywhere near to showing the chaos. Men with megaphones warned children, people wearing glasses, people holding children, and the elderly to get out of the way, as they could be injured in the mad grab. Why they bothered with the elderly I don’t know, as they were by far the most violent! I was in the back, on the very periphery, and still got knocked down, shoved, punched, and elbowed in the face. At the end I saw a girl with blood down her back — not her blood, someone else’s!

And yes, I did get a mochi, but I gave it to a kid who’d been smacked in the head by one.

So there you have it! The Nagoya Hounen Matsuri. I’ll just note that when I called to see if it would still be running after the quakes, I was informed that yes, it would, but it would be a more sombre version in deference to the disaster. If this is the sombre version, I’m glad I missed the raucous one!

For more photos, check out my Flickr set!

I'm going to break my cardinal blogging rule with this post — "Never use the accusatory 'you', as it only alienates and angers" — because I don't know how else to write it.

To those with loved ones in Japan who've been following the news:

If you've been contacting them to share every single scrap of speculation that's crossed your inbox or television screen …

If you've been glossing over reports of progress with the cooling system or radiation levels or evacuations in favour of rumours of catastrophe …

If you've been responding to your loved ones' reassurances that they're safe with "But haven't you heard…"

If you've been telling them that the Japanese government is lying …

If you've been laying guilt on your loved ones for staying, accusing them of not caring about your feelings …

If you've ever dismissed them with, "You have to understand my concern!" or "We just love you, that's all!" …

If you've talked of nothing else but the disaster …

If you've ever used the phrase "You're going to die" …

If you've been sending links to bad news and saying "I told you that you weren't safe" …

If you've used this time to campaign against nuclear power …

If you've mentioned that you never wanted them in this country in the first place, and this is just proof of why …

If you've been getting angry with a loved one who refuses to panic because they "just don't understand" …

If you've ever accused them of not comprehending the danger …

If you've blamed them for your own lack of sleep or anxiety because you've been "so worried" …

If you've continued any of this after they have expressly asked you to stop …

STOP IT.

I'm going to write that again.

STOP. IT.

Believe me, we understand. We understand that people are worried. We understand that people love us. We understand that our families and friends can't sleep. We understand. We do.

But we are the ones who live here. Let me give you some case studies:

Friend #1 lives in the directly-affected area; his apartment and school were hit. He's in another city now, making contingency plans and trying to get his life together. His biggest concern at the moment is finding gas for his car. But he can't go five minutes without someone from home calling him, demanding that he return — how could he be so INSENSITIVE as to deny his FAMILY their SON whom they LOVE doesn't he know they haven't been SLEEPING because they've been so WORRIED –

Friend #2 lives in an unaffected area, nearly a thousand kilometres away from Fukushima. She's stressed, confused (as anyone would be) about who to believe in this situation, with all the experts crawling out of the woodwork and proclaiming completely contrary things. Nevertheless, she's trying to balance worrying about the country she absolutely adores, and actually getting through the day. But her family won't stop. E-mails, phone calls, messages, all trying to convince her to come home before she dies of radiation poisoning, aftershocks, tsunami, Mt. Fuji exploding, and lord knows what else. She needs her family to be strong for her because she's afraid, but they won't.

Friend #3 has gone home to visit her family, completely coincidentally — the ticket was booked months ago — and within an hour of her landing nearly had a near mental breakdown because all anyone talked about was how all her friends still in Japan were going to die, and how she shouldn't return because she's safe now and they don't want her to die, too. The only conversation, from the airport and continuing back at home, has been them sharing every bit of disaster "info" they'd gleaned since the last time they talked with her. If she gave them good news before getting on the plane, they gleefully told her how new "facts" came to light that means everything is 5,000 times worse. 

This is just three example cases out of thousands.  In fact, nearly every single friend I have here in Japan is going through the same thing.  And if we try to talk about it, many of our families and friends call us insensitive, brainwashed, stupid, stubborn, uninformed. It goes on. 

Being a foreigner in Japan right now is like being Link in The Ocarina of Time, with our loved ones back home playing the part of Navi. Every time we try to do anything, we hear the voice — "Hey! Hey! Listen! Hey! Watch out! Listen! Hey! Hey! Hey!"  Poor Navi just wanted to help. So do the people back home, who are scared and helpless. But trust me when I say it's not helping.

When my mother had cancer for the nth and final time, I was shocked at how insensitive people could be. They stopped her in the streets, at the grocery store, in church, or phoned her home, to tell her about their son or neighbour or sister or brother's wife's physician who'd had cancer and died a slow, painful death. They wanted to connect with her, to share their pain with someone who understood. They wanted to profess their concern. They left the conversation feeling better. Unfortunately, what they didn't see was the disastrous effect this had on my mother, who would be left shaking and in tears after those conversations. My father put up a sign on the door that said "HAPPY STORIES ONLY", and still this did not deter people, who thought that it must mean other people, not them, because they understood.

This is what the constant dire predictions are doing to the people who are trying to live their lives here. 

So if you do know or love someone here in Japan, and you're thinking of sending them an article from CNN or the New York Times or Bubba's Blog of Bullshine, stop. Consider that whoever you think you're "informing" will have received it from every single person they know back home already. Consider that they're the ones who are actually in danger, not you. Consider that they still have to live, and work, and eat, and survive. Consider that they're not doing any of this to spite you.

We love you. We're glad to have your support. There's nothing wrong with e-mailing to say "Thinking of you" or "I have you in my prayers" or to tell us you've donated money to relief efforts in Japan. I'm touched, in fact, to find out that the parents of friends, or bosses, or grocery store clerks, have been contacting my friends and family to express their concern and support. If this experience has taught me anything, it's how large the web of connections between people truly is.

But please, please, stop telling us about the danger.  Message received, loud and clear. Believe me.

Apologies for the quality; I took this from my TV yesterday. This is a shot from a rescue of an elderly couple found in Souma, by a helicopter that had been doing pan-shots of the flooding. The camera helicopter saw them, called in a rescue helicopter, and they were both rescued within 15 minutes. The cameras stayed on them the entire time.

I just figured with all the destruction photos, it might be nice to have something a little less doom and gloom.

IMG_3096

And life goes on.

It's weird to think how little time has passed. When you consider that there have been hundreds of quakes, multiple tsunami, several fires, and the threat of nuclear meltdown, when I think of how little sleep I've had and how much time I've spent on the phone, e-mailing, on Twitter, and glued to local news broadcasts, struggling through rapid-fire, specific vocabulary in my third language — well, it's amazing to think it hasn't been much over 36 hours.

I've been following some of the US and UK media off and on, and I have to say, I'm horrified. I see things like "Panic and desperation grip Japan", shot after shot of destruction, multiple experts nodding gravely and saying things like "the next Chernobyl", and hopelessly exaggerated death counts.  I see nothing of hope, nor the resilience of the Japanese spirit that I've seen in person.

I don't live in an area that was affected by the quakes or any of the aftermath, but I have friends who do.  These people saw an outpouring of support unlike anything I've ever seen before — shops opened their doors and offered free food and drinks to the displaced; all public payphones in affected areas became free of charge; home phone company NTT revoked charges for any calls made to or from the affected areas; myriad universities and hotels offered free space to anyone who needed it.  Despite multiple banks, supermarkets, or convenience stores being smashed open by the quakes, there has not been one verified incident of looting or thievery.

The Japanese government has been broadcasting support and the importance of harmony, fellowship, and lack of panic. While other countries revel in the destruction, showing the same clips of the waves sweeping over Fukushima, the Japanese media focuses on little things: an elderly couple in Souma-shi, getting airlifted from their house, isolated on a mud flat in the midst of nothing but water; students from an elementary school, who fled to the second floor during the flooding, returned to their parents; people being pulled, alive and unharmed, from rubbish, and handed hot drinks and blankets by bystanders.

When news broke of the radiation leakage and the explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, I expected the televisions to be splashed with infographics of the potential fallout, showing kill zones and decay zones.  But nothing happened.  Instead, a Japanese official held up a diagram of the reactor's coolant system, explained how it was failing, and what they were doing to allay the damage.

 In fact, the focus on rebuilding and rescue, the lack of sensationalism and destruction-porn has been so intense that it's made me, a foreigner, a little twitchy.

I wanted to know what the damage would be; I wanted to know if I was in danger, if I should be planning an escape, if I should be blocking all vents and door cracks with wet towels or rushing for the airport.  Around me, the Internet teemed with speculation.  But the Japanese government and media refused to join in, only speaking once experts had determined the actual situation.  (Spoiler: we're fine.)  

It was an upsetting experience for me; I relied on friends in other countries to supply me with information from the BBC (which seems to be the only news outlet not engaging in insanity) so I could at least have something to go on, only to find it negated several times.  My panic was exponential compared to what it would have been if I were Japanese, calmly waiting to hear the results — which, in the end, were not worrisome at all, compared with what I put myself through.

I'm not Japanese. I will still seek as many information sources as I can, even if I am running myself ragged and sleeping very little. I don't think I can help it. But there's something to be said for the Japanese ability to take anything and keep going; for the distaste for panic and destruction that so permeates journalism back home. 

Today I went out to lunch, and life was as normal here in Kansai as it could possibly be. People laughed and chatted; the televisions in the supermarket played advertisements, not the news; no one stood in street corners shouting doom and gloom predictions.  At first I was shocked and a little horrified — why were they ignoring the horrible destruction that was happening to their countrymen? — but then I realized. Why should they panic? People here in Kansai have sent their support — money, supplies, trucks, shelters, phone lines — and that's all they can do.  Creating a national sense of fear and panic won't make the tsunami stop, and won't keep the nuclear plant from a meltdown.  So these people have decided their role is to keep Japan moving, to keep the national spirit up, to wait for news rather than manufacture it themselves.

I don't fully understand it, and I spent the day entirely frustrated as what I saw to be a lack of information.  In my most panicked, cynical moments I thought it a testament to Japan's over-reliance on 'tatemae', that is, putting appearances before all else for the sake of public harmony.  But the more I think about it, the more I turn on the television and see families reuniting, the more I think maybe they know something we don't.

I've had a few online people contact me, so just thought I'd do a housekeeping post — my area of Japan is perfectly fine. The earthquake & tsunami are all up to the north-east.

Earthquake damage: I live in a light blue dot and work at a white one:

Quake

Tsunami warning:

I live in a yellow zone.

Tsunami 

My thoughts to Sendai and others in the tsunami warning zones. Hopefully everything works out fine.

This is a question for everyone, religious or not, vehemently anti-religion or not. How much religion is too much in a story not shelved in the Christian Literature section?

I've often wondered what it is that gets something marketed as "Christian Fiction" as opposed to not. C.S. Lewis gets put both there and in regular fiction for his Narnia series; likewise Madeleine L'Engle's Time Quartet also gets a space in both. Allegorical fantasy, at least, seems to be able to play both sides of the fence. 

Then there are all the Christian romances, which — I must admit — bemuse me just as much as their sexy counterparts, because while they have just as much sexual tension and awkwardness, instead of the inevitable dive into the sheets, we get kisses (maybe) and a lot of conversation. These are definitely religion-only, mostly because I can't imagine the two demographics cross over very much.

But what about books where religion isn't a theme or a plot point, but is still part of the characters' lives?  They obviously don't belong in the Christian Lit section, any more than regular books that include a love story belong on the Romance shelves.  So as such, is there a limit to how much religion can play a part in a character before mainstream readers (or agents, or editors) start shutting off?

It's a real problem, I think, that religion rarely comes into stories as anything but negative — whether it's the amusingly sheltered Flanders family, the intolerant orthodox parents of a gay teen, the sexually-repressed religious school that hampers our free-thinking heroine, or the bitter, reactionary Hollywood Atheist (because few atheists are happy in fiction). Because of this, mentioning someone's religion — or lack thereof — in a story brings with it a lot of baggage.

I am Christian myself, and openly so; my characters range from anywhere along the Judeo-Christian belief spectrum to complete atheists.  I don't write Muslims because I don't know enough about the beliefs to do a good job, but if a character insisted, I'd have to do research and talk to people to find out. Sometimes I wonder if this religious content will give me trouble later on.

The thing is, my Christian characters aren't perfect — they mess up, they lie, they make mistakes, they hurt people, they have premarital sex (some of them). And when they do, while it's not applauded, and while they do their best to make things up, there's not a moral behind it. I don't write parables. On the other hand, they do attempt to be good people, and their beliefs do influence their lives. They attribute part of their happiness and their selves to their religion. Many of them are gay or bisexual; some take a while to conflate the two, others never saw a problem. None of them have homophobic religious parents. There are enough negative portrayals of religious characters that I refuse to write them, ever.

I'm writing a collaborative YA urban fantasy series with a Jewish main protagonist; when he's younger, Judaism is mostly something he does because that's the culture around him, but the older he gets, the more real his faith becomes to him. There's a huge plot element that results in a breakdown, and part of it is a crisis of faith resulting from said plot element. 

Meanwhile, I have atheists and agnostics; some apathetic, some militant, but all of them are good people. None of them are morally corrupt or bankrupt; none of them cry themselves to sleep from the emptiness of it all, or drink or take drugs or dive into promiscuity to fill the hole. Some have their reasons for not believing; others have just never been given a reason to believe. Some desperately want to believe, but never find themselves convinced, no matter how much they may want to. Some think it's stupid. Some just don't care. Some convert; some don't.

Would any of this turn people off?

I ask not because I intend to 'sanitize' my work of religion, nor will I apologize for it (it's as much a part of those characters as atheism is to the others), but because I'm honestly curious. I know people who will put a book back if a character mentions God in a positive way at all; is this a general trend? Is there a point where you would stop reading because of religion, and if so, where is that line?